Exploring Biophilic Design in Eco-Tourism: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental and Architectural Synergy in Tropical and Subtropical Contexts

Saleem Abubakar Fagam; Musa Lawal Sagada; Kashim Ibn Yakubu; Thomas Terna Aule; Zakari Abdullahi Tijjani

doi:10.63561/japs.v2i3.817

Authors

Saleem Abubakar Fagam Department of Architecture, Aliko Dangote University of Science and Technology, Wudil –Nigeria
Musa Lawal Sagada Department of Architecture, Aliko Dangote University of Science and Technology, Wudil –Nigeria
Kashim Ibn Yakubu Department of Architecture, Aliko Dangote University of Science and Technology, Wudil –Nigeria
Thomas Terna Aule Department of Architectural Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Kaura Namoda – Nigeria
Zakari Abdullahi Tijjani Department of Architectural Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Daura - Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63561/japs.v2i3.817

Keywords:

Biophilic Design, Sustainable Architecture, Resort Design, Environmental, Psychology, Human-Nature Connection, Community

Abstract

This study explores the integration of biophilic design principles in resort architecture across three diverse ecological settings: Yankari Game Reserve in Bauchi, Nigeria; Jean Michel Cousteau Resort in Vanua Levu Island, Fiji; and Kailumcito at the Camptel Resort, Mexico. Biophilic design—an approach that fosters human connection to nature through architectural features—has been recognised for its potential to enhance well-being, environmental sustainability, and user satisfaction. Using qualitative analysis of five key biophilic design features (natural lighting and ventilation, local materials, views and prospects, natural features, and natural forms and processes), the study reveals that only natural lighting and ventilation scored positively across all cases. The other elements were either poorly implemented or overlooked, particularly local material use and natural forms, indicating a disconnect between architectural intent and environmental context. These findings are linked to prior research emphasising the psychological and ecological benefits of immersive natural environments, yet highlight a persistent implementation gap in the limited use of local materials. The study recommends greater policy support, design education, and community engagement to promote biophilic design. It also suggests further research into long-term user experiences in biophilic spaces. This research contributes to sustainable architectural practice by identifying opportunities to align built environments more closely with natural ecosystems.

References

Allen, J. G., MacNaughton, P., Satish, U., Santanam, S., Vallarino, J., & Spengler, J. D. (2018). Associations of cognitive function scores with carbon dioxide, ventilation, and volatile organic compound exposures in office workers: A controlled exposure study of green and conventional office environments. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(6), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510037

Aule, T. T., Majid, R. B. A. & Jusan, M. B. M. (2022). Exploring cultural values and sustainability preferences in housing development: A structural equation modelling approach.Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 31(3), pp. 149–160. https://doi.org/10.22630/srees.2971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22630/srees.2971

Beatley, T. (2016). Handbook of Biophilic City Planning & Design. Island Press. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-620-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-621-9

Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature (Vol. 688136915). Harper Perennial, Morrow: New York. Retrieved 10 May 2025, from www.jobs.aol.com

Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health and Well-Being in the Built Environment. Terrapin Bright Green. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/report/14-patterns/

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://edge.sagepub.com/creswellqi4e/access-codes-0

Givoni, B. (1998). Climate considerations in building and urban design. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com.ng/url?client=ca-print-wiley_default&format=googleprint&num=0&id=cbLHEAAAQBAJ&q=http://www.

Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural Research Methods, (2nd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. www.wiley.com/go/permisions

Heerwagen, J. H. (2006). Investing in people: The social benefits of sustainable design. Rethinking sustainable construction. Sarasota, FL, 19, 22.

IUCN. (2020). The role of traditional knowledge in sustainable development. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Retrieved 10 May 2025, from https://www.iucn.org/resources/publications/role-traditional-knowledge-sustainable-development

Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com.ng/url?client=ca-google-print&format=googleprint&num=0&id=7l80AAAAIAAJ&q=http://www.amazon.com/gp/search%3Findex%3Dbooks%26linkCode%3Dqs%26keywords%3D9780521349390&usg=AOvVaw3I1DP4K1KoqQYKvYnW0U7S&source=gbs_buy_r

Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2011). Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. John Wiley & Sons.https://books.google.com.ng/url?client=ca-print-wiley_default&format=googleprint&num=0&id=FyNer_nQrW4C&q=http://www.wiley.com/remtitle.cgi%3FISBN%3D9781118174241&usg=AOvVaw0AKSCmEnkDRm6V-AliGvos&source=gbs_buy_r

Kellert, S. R. (2018). Nature by Design: The Practice of Biophilic Design. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235432

Le, Q. B., Nguyen, H. T., & Tran, D. T. (2020). Biophilic design applications in hospitality architecture: Lessons from Southeast Asia. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(7), 1058–1077.

Malgwi, E. M. & Sagada, M. L. (2014). An evaluation of thermal comfort conditions in an urban entertainment centre in hot-dry climate of Nigeria. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Research (IJEER), 2(1), pp. 55–74. Available at: www.ea-journals.org.

Olawuyi, O. W., Sagada, M. L., Saliu, H. O., & Sholanke, A. B. (2022). Appraisal of the Use of Green Building Design Strategies in Students' Hostels of Selected Universities in Nigeria.International Journal of Thesis Projects and Dissertations (IJTPD), 10 (October 2023), pp. 155–163. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7116119.

Olotuah, A. O., & Adesiji, A. O. (2005). Sustainable use of traditional materials in building construction: A case study of selected buildings in Akure, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Design and Management, 1(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16955.08485

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Ryan, C. O., Browning, W. D., Clancy, J. O., Andrews, S. L., & Kallianpurkar, N. B. (2014). Biophilic design patterns: Emerging nature-based parameters for health and well-being in the built environment. International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR, 8(2), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i2.436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i2.436

Sagada, M. L. (2013). Mitigating the effects of climate change on infrastructure, NIA BGM, (2190755), pp. 94–101.

Sagada, M. L. (2016). Integrating green infrastructure to enhance the environmental quality of high-density residential areas in Zaria. In 21st Century Human Habitat: Issues, Sustainability and Development, pp. 115–123.

Sorvig, K., & Thompson, J. W. (2018). Basic Principles: Sustainability in Context. In Sustainable Landscape Construction: A Guide to Green Building Outdoors (pp. 1-46). Washington, DC: Island Press/Centre for Resource Economics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-811-4_1

Terrapin Bright Green. (2019). Biophilic Design Case Studies. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/reports/biophilic-design-case-studies/

Terrapin Bright Green. (2012). The Economics of Biophilia: Why Designing with Nature in Mind Makes Financial Sense. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/reports/the-economics-of-biophilia/

UNESCO. (2015). Culture for sustainable development: The role of culture in the sustainable development goals. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org/en/culture-sustainable-development

Valentine, N., Durning, S., Shanahan, E. M., & Schuwirth, L. (2021). Fairness in human judgement in assessment: A hermeneutic literature review and conceptual framework. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 26(2), 713-738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-10002-1

White, M. P., Elliott, L. R., Gascon, M., Roberts, B., & Fleming, L. E. (2020). Blue space, health and well-being: A narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits. Environmental Research, 191, 110169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110169

White, M. P., Alcock, I., Grellier, J., Wheeler, B. W., Hartig, T., Warber, S. L., ... & Fleming, L. E. (2019). Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and well-being. Scientific reports, 9(1), 7730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3

Wilson, E. O. (2017). Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In Evolutionary perspectives on environmental problems (pp. 250-258). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792650-18

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. https://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz1009406280inh.htm