Development of a User-Centered Prototype Model for Low-Code Development Platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63561/jca.v2i4.1073Keywords:
Low code, Development Platforms, User interface, Citizen Developers, Task performance.Abstract
This research work investigates the user experience (UX) of selected Low-Code Development Platforms (LCDPs), specifically Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, and Mendix. The study addresses the growing demand for user-friendly development tools among both technical and non-technical users, emphasizing the need for platforms that balance simplicity, functionality, and performance. A hands-on testing approach was employed, involving real users completing pre-defined tasks on the selected LCDPs. Data was collected through direct observation, task timing, and structured surveys measuring usability parameters such as ease of navigation, learnability, responsiveness, and interface satisfaction. The feedback obtained revealed several user challenges, including unintuitive interfaces, lack of contextual help and complexity in task execution for novice users. In response, a prototype named FlowFrame was developed using Figma, incorporating improvements based on users’ feedbacks. The prototype featured an intuitive dashboard, drag-and-drop functionality, AI-powered suggestions, and smart onboarding flows aimed at enhancing learnability and task efficiency. Findings show that FlowFrame significantly improves the perceived usability and user satisfaction compared to existing platforms. The design prioritizes clarity, guidance, and simplicity, especially for non-technical users. The study demonstrates that user-centered design and simulation can effectively address the usability gaps in current LCDPs. The study further recommends the adoption of intelligent design principles and the integration of AI assistance to enhance user experience in future platform developments.
References
Akwukwuma, V. V. N., Chete, F. O., Okpako, A. E., & Irabor, M. (2024). User interface design and efficiency using graphic design and animation techniques. NIPES Journal of Science and Technology Research, 6(3).
Akwukwuma, V. V. N., Chete, F. O., Okpako, A. E., & Nkwor, U. M. (2024). Usability analysis of e-commerce mobile applications. NIPES Journal of Science and Technology Research, 6(3).
Ardito, C., Buono, P. D., Costabile, M. F., & Lanzilotti, R. (2021). Usability engineering for the design and evaluation of user interfaces. Journal of Systems and Software, 165, 110567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110567
Del Buono, P., Ardito, C., & Lanzilotti, R. (2022). A comparative evaluation of low-code development platforms: Usability and cognitive load perspectives. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 63, 101056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2022.101056
Guthardt, T., Kosiol, J., & Hohlfeld, O. (2024). Low-code vs. the developer: An empirical study on the developer experience and efficiency of a no-code platform. MODELS Companion ’24 (ACM/IEEE).
Henriques, P. et al. (2021). A Use Case-based Investigation of Low-Code Development Platforms. CEUR Workshop Proceedings — qualitative/experimental comparisons using realistic use cases and prototypes.
Käss, S., Strahringer, S., & Westner, M. (2022–2023). Drivers and Inhibitors / Practitioners’ Perceptions on LCDP adoption. (Conference paper 2022; journal article 2023). See: Drivers & Inhibitors (CBI 2022) and IEEE Access 2023 article.
Mendling, J., Weber, I., van der Aalst, W. M. P., vom Brocke, J., Cabanillas, C., Daniel, F., & Weidlich, M. (2021). Blockchains for business process management: Challenges and opportunities. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 9(1), 4:1–4:16.
Mifsud, J. (2015). Usability metrics: A guide to quantify the usability of any system. https://usabilitygeek.com/usability-metrics-a-guide-to-quantify-system-usaility/
Palomares, C., Cabot, J., & Gómez, C. (2020). A systematic literature review of low-code development platforms. Information and Software Technology, 132, 106441.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2020). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
Westner, M., Käss, S., & Strahringer, S. (2023). Practitioners’ Perceptions on the Adoption of Low Code Development Platforms. IEEE Access, 11, 29009–29034. Khan, R., Omar, N., & Ismail, S. (2023). Evaluating LCDPs for user registration, database use, and deployment capabilities. Journal of Digital Platforms and Applications, 5(2), 102–118.
